Attachment Two: Errata

The following corrections to the IPM Program and corresponding EA are being made and incorporated herein by reference into the Agency Record. A Final IPM Program will be printed which reflects these changes.

PGC IPM PROGRAM EDITS
Section/paragraph Old Text Revised Text
(additions/changes highlighted)
2.5 paragraph 1 The Colma Foundation is a poorly undulated sandstone that consists of flat lying fine-grained, silty sand, and occasional beds of clay derived from ancient sand dunes and alluvial material dating back to the Pleistocene in the last ice age (Schlocker, 1974) The Colma Foundation is a poorly indurated sandstone that consists of flat lying fine-grained, silty sand, and occasional beds of clay derived from ancient sand dunes and alluvial material dating back to the Pleistocene in the last ice age (Schlocker, 1974)
2.8.3 paragraph 2 A minor subbasin exists at the top of the course, which drains in a southeasterly direction. A minor subbasin exists at the top of the course (half of hole 18), which drains in a southeasterly direction toward Tennessee Hollow.
2.8.3 paragraph 3 The first subbasin drains holes 1, 2, 3, half of 8, 9, 10, and 18. The first subbasin drains holes 1, 2, 3, half of 8, 9, 10, and half of 18.
2.8.3 paragraph 3   Added: The downstream end of this canal is intended to be restored to native habitat by the Presidio Trust, National Park Service, and Golden Gate National Parks Association, under the Mountain Lake Enhancement Plan.
2.8.3 paragraph 5   As suggested by the NPS, the text was changed to include hole 5 in the second subbasin, and to clarify that the third subbasin ultimately drains to Mountain Lake.
3.2 paragraph 1
Turf Selection guidelines		   Added:
•Invasiveness. Non-invasive turf grasses should be selected to reduce the possibility of the spread of non-native grasses throughout the Presidio.
Table 12.1   Section numbers referenced in the table have been updated to reflect changes made since the previous draft in order to refer to the correct sections of the program.
12.6 paragraph 1 A RAVE score will be calculated on a case-by-case basis for each pesticide application before it occurs, and no applications that pose a moderate or high risk to groundwater (i.e. RAVE score of 65 or greater) will occur on the course.

The following typographical correction has been made:
A RAVE score will be calculated on a case-by-case basis for each pesticide application before it occurs, and no applications that pose a moderate or high risk to groundwater (i.e. RAVE score of 45 or greater) will occur on the course.
12.9 paragraph 1   Addition of the following sentence: If an adjuvant would increase a pesticide's leachability, this must be accounted for in the RAVE analysis (see Section 12.6) of the application.
13.1.7 paragraph 1 Applications with a RAVE score of 65 or greater shall not occur on the course. The following typographical correction has been made:
Applications with a RAVE score of 45 or greater shall not occur on the course.
14.3 List of stormwater sampling locations   Addition of a 7th stormwater sampling location:
In the rough to the northeast of the back half of the 18th fairway. (This location point was also added to figure 4)
Chapter 13 Title Chemical Pesticides Chemical Pesticides: Use and Restrictions
Chapter 14 Title Environmental Monitoring, Reporting, and Mitigation Water Quality Monitoring, Reporting, and Mitigation
14.1 Monitoring of surface and near surface groundwater will be done to assess the movement, if any, of pesticides applied to the course. Monitoring of surface water and near surface groundwater will be done to assess the movement, if any, of pesticides applied to the course.
14.2 paragraph 1 After any pesticide application on fairways, piezometers at the 1st, 12th, and 14th fairways will be monitored for flow and sampled if water is available. After any pesticide application on fairways, piezometers at the 1st, 12th, and 14th fairways will be monitored for the presence of water and sampled if water is available.
14.2 paragraph 2 Approximate flow rate in gallons per hour or equivolent units will be recorded at the time of the sampling. Approximate flow rate through the drain box in gallons per hour or equivolent units will be recorded at the time of the sampling.
14.3 paragraph 3 Samples will be analyzed for pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), nitrate, ammonia, sulfate, phosphate, and the last pesticide applied to the course. Samples will be analyzed for pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), nitrate, ammonia, sulfate, phosphate, and any pesticide applied to the course in the previous twelve months.
14.5 If this assessment indicates that continued use of a pesticide poses a risk, consultation with qualified personnel from the Trust, and from one or more of the following organizations will occur: DPR, the manufacturer, the Trust, or other qualified experts. If this assessment indicates that continued use of a pesticide poses a risk, consultation with the Trust IPM Coordinator, and from one or more of the following organizations will occur: DPR, the manufacturer, University Extension, or other qualified experts.
14.5
Figure 60: Pesticide monitoring and use decision tree		   Changed the decision tree so that the "consultation box" precedes the "Risk Present?" decision.

 

PGC IPM PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA)
Section Old Text Revised Text (additional/changes highlighted)
E-9 However, no requirements for preventative management or non-chemical pest management would be enforced. Consequently, the use of chemical pest management could increase, and chemicals with higher risk to groundwater could be called for. However, no requirements for preventative management or non-chemical pest management would be enforced under the No Action Alternative. Since it is the use of preventative management and monitoring to catch pests early that allows for the effective use of mant of the low-risk pesticides, pesticides with higher risk to groundwater could be called for under this alternative.
E-19&20   Added the following paragraph: Under the No Action Alternative, pesticide storage and selection would be conducted according to CA EPA guidelines. Thus, storage requirements would be the same as the preferred alternative, but the selection of pesticides could be of higher risk pesticides (see Section E-9). All applicable laws and regulations for the storage and handling of these materials would be implemented.
E-25 Expose pesticides to fish? Expose fish to pesticides?
E-31 These actions include projects implementing the Presidio Vegetation Management Plan, the Mountain Lake Enhancement Plan, the Draft Recovery Plan for Coastal Plants of the Northern San Francisco Peninsula, the Crissy Field Plan, the Tennessee Hollow Restoration Plan, and the Presidio Golf Course Habitat and Wildlife Management Plan. These actions include projects implementing the Presidio Vegetation Management Plan, the Mountain Lake Enhancement Plan, the Draft Recovery Plan for Coastal Plants of the Northern San Francisco Peninsula, the Crissy Field Plan, the Tennessee Hollow Restoration Plan, and the Presidio Golf Course Habitat and Wildlife Management Plan, and the Lobos Creek Water Quality Management Plan.